Jump to content
NEurope

Forums

  1. N-Europe

    1. Board News & Issues

      Any news regarding the forum will be detailed in here. Also contains suggestions, questions and error reporting threads.
      9,814
      posts
  2. General

    1. General Chit Chat

      This is the place to chat about anything!

      809,212
      posts
  3. Console Talk

    1. Nintendo Gaming

      Talk about Nintendo's consoles and their games here, including the Nintendo Switch, Wii U & 3DS.

      474,117
      posts
    2. General Gaming Discussion

      Discuss anything related to gaming as a hobby and an industry, including retro games.
      75,117
      posts
    3. Other Consoles

      A forum for any non-Nintendo consoles, including PC gaming.
      220,723
      posts
  • 1-up Mushroom

    Support N-Europe!

    Get rid of advertisements and help cover hosting costs on N-Europe

    Become a Patron!

  • Posts

    • Ultimately I think it's an issue either way. I agree with you that the people in charge of VAR and their training/lack of ownership over issues is what needs to be improved, but after years of the Premier League consistently getting it wrong and seeing it used generally much more efficiently and accurately in other leagues/competitions, I think this being pushed forward isn't so much a commentary on the technology itself, but rather the people on charge of it. Teams voting against it, as I see it, aren't viewing against the technology, even if a byproduct of this being passed could be it being removed for the foreseeable future; they're effectively making it a vote of no confidence in the current referring leadership and VAR overseers.  Because I do also think it's a big step backwards if it gets removed at this point, some of the nice QOL aspects people don't think about and a lot of the right decisions being made are being overlooked in essentially returning to a Wild West approach. Semi-automated offsides like you highlight are absolutely going to be beneficial as far as I'm concerned, and I would have also liked similar checks extended to corners in the future, because the amount of times I randomly tune in and watch a replay of a shot taking a slight but meaningful deflection off a defender, or being finger-tipped over or around woodwork by a goalkeeper, only to then see a goal kick awarded is insane.  I'm in total agreement, but I think any retrospective vote would also have questions raised and be a bit of a mess too, for instance the 100 journalists who comprise the voting jury from the 100 highest-ranked nations in the world – are these then going to be the same journalists who would have voted in 2020? Do they still have the full context of that season in their memory outside of a highlights reel to jog their memory? If any nation has slipped out of the Top 100 since 2020, are they still allowed to have their journalist partake and vote, or would their replacement nation in the rankings have their journalist vote? I think you end up with at least one more additional asterisk based on how the vote would be handled.  And so on. I totally agree with you, but I guess if nothing else the questions about the vote here aren't around the winner like they should be - the purpose of the vote ultimately is to find that winner - but rather the process and who then comes 2nd, 3rd, 4th...and so on. The other things I see as nice to have – but history will remember who won, and Lewa is absolutely owed that Ballon D'Or in fairness. It's not a serious question for them to entertain which could be why they would be keen to bypass it if they decide to make it happen.  Now, how exactly that would track in a year where there were two or more frontrunners, like in the prime years of Messi vs Ronaldo? I'm not quite sure. But hopefully nothing serious enough ever happens again that France Football takes it on themselves to revolve the centre of the football awards universe around the potential early overreaction and subsequent cancellation of the weakest of the five major leagues in Europe 
    • The Dune hype continues with Dune: Prophecy. 
    • Oh. So I could finally play RDR2. Such a shame that I have no fucking time
    • VAR isn't the issue, the people running it is. We're still going to have the same, if not more, errors and controversy, the only difference this will mean is there is no chance of it being overturned. For example Luis Diaz's goal, possibly the biggest incident being cited as the reason VAR shouldn't be used, was ruled out on the pitch. Yes, it was a major fuck up to not overturn the decision but the fact is with VAR gone the goal still would not have stood. Also, just last month the Premier League approved the use of semi-automated offside so possibly the thing that VAR has struggled most with - offsides - won't be as much of an issue. People really have rose tinted glasses about the state of the game and the quality of referring/decisions before VAR. Scrapping it would be a big step backwards.
    • I think I'd probably rather see them fix it rather than scrap it entirely but I guess we'll see what happens.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      36,294
    • Total Posts
      1,887,181
×