PDA

View Full Version : New PS3 game screens. TGS special.


Choze
16-09-2005, 05:32 PM
Vision Gran Turismo

http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/651/651358/vision-gt-20050916010824429.jpg


Genji 2

http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/651/651373/genji-2-20050916025558740.jpg


Lair ( Factor 5 )

http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/651/651387/lair-20050916042717444.jpg

assassin-20050916011909600.jpg[/IMG]

Choze
16-09-2005, 05:32 PM
MotorStorm

http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/651/651388/motorstorm-20050916044641246.jpg


The Getaway PS3

http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/651/651390/the-getaway-ps3-20050916045717509.jpg


Project Assasin ( UBISOFT )

http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/651/651359/project-assassin-20050916011909600.jpg

Dante
16-09-2005, 05:40 PM
Nice.

Here (http://www.jeux-france.com/news12396_metal-gear-solid-4-presente-au-tgs.html) are the screenshots of MGS4:GOP.

http://www.jeux-france.com/Webmasters/Images/41441420050916_093656_0_big.jpg

masaki86
16-09-2005, 05:48 PM
wow; everything looks so pretty...off topic; can we please stop leeching off other sites bandwidth by [img] posting with their links; upload on a photobucket account or something.

dukkadukka
17-09-2005, 10:07 PM
great graphics, nothing particularly interesting though, apart from the fact solid snake looks like he'd be better off at home in his slippers and sipping on a warm mug of cocoa.

Ray Falling
17-09-2005, 10:12 PM
Looking sweet! Anything more on FF7?

Smalldude76
17-09-2005, 10:13 PM
The're all very sexy, but all look like CG and nothing in-game. Project Assassin really captured my attention, is there any other information on it?

Stocka
17-09-2005, 10:41 PM
If those are in game then HOLY SPUNK

Choze
17-09-2005, 10:41 PM
The're all very sexy, but all look like CG and nothing in-game. Project Assassin really captured my attention, is there any other information on it?

Assassin is the only one that isnt realtime here. Its artwork. Genji is a character model. Gran Turismo 5 is still being improved so what you see here is just an enhancement of 4. Lair is an engine showing. Thats two dragons fighting. Getaway is CELL rendered. No GPU involved. Motorstrom we shall see.

MGS4 rules currently. Realistic skin that sweats(sweat actually takes some dirt off with it!), folds, creases etc. to debris and dirt hittin/falling on characters realistically etc. Looks too bloody good. Killzone looked good but this is ten times more immersive.

Jordan
17-09-2005, 10:51 PM
Oh please, half of these are pre-rendered. Its bloody obvious, Sony hasn't even given out full dev kits yet and as far as i know, nVidia has even finished up on the graphics chip.

GoonFace
17-09-2005, 10:54 PM
These are blody amazing. I can't believe that some people are prepared to say that we do not need a nex gen as the graphics won't be significantly better, because they clearly are.

Fierce_LiNk
17-09-2005, 10:59 PM
If you're going to be playing a game, why the hell are going to care if the character sweats or something? It'll be good for cut-scenes, but i still don't see how it's going to matter that much.

Choze
17-09-2005, 11:25 PM
Oh please, half of these are pre-rendered. Its bloody obvious, Sony hasn't even given out full dev kits yet and as far as i know, nVidia has even finished up on the graphics chip.

Developers have full development beta kits. Still underpowered but thats what MGS4 was running on. The kits are in a good stage compared to other consoles in the past. :smile: RSX will be done soon.

graphics didnt mean shit back in the snes/mega drive days

They always have always will.

If you're going to be playing a game, why the hell are going to care if the character sweats or something? It'll be good for cut-scenes, but i still don't see how it's going to matter that much.

Makes the game more immersive. Like in the trailer where dust , debris and stuff is flying about in the wind and makes contact with characters like in real life. Immersion is key in many games.

Or this:

http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/2960/mgs11bq.jpg Thats sweat taking some of the dirt of his face.

realistic animation of the skin.
http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/5743/mgs35od.jpg

There's more stuff in the trailer.

I think its unfair to compare PS3 to xbox 360 or Rev. Whats good on those two consoles may nto look good on PS3.

Jordan
18-09-2005, 12:32 AM
Errr... thats because PS3 works of an stupidly complex system of multiple core idiocy as Gabe Newelle nicley put it. Developers have enough job working with one core, never mind the 12 or whatever PS3 is running off. Developers are going to have a tough job with this thing. It's a shame they didn't keep the PS2 jaggies, you know for nostalgia reasons.

From what i've seen so far, in benchmarks. Theoretically PS3 is slightly more powerful, but put into practise its a totally different matter. Besides, its early days, we can't judge anything yet.

Choze
18-09-2005, 12:53 AM
Errr... thats because PS3 works of an stupidly complex system of multiple core idiocy as Gabe Newelle nicley put it.

And xbox doesnt? ;)


Developers have enough job working with one core, never mind the 12 or whatever PS3 is running off. Developers are going to have a tough job with this thing.

Mainly the pc developers. Gabe is upset he cant just port his engine over. Epic are likely will have the most popular pc engine.

It's a shame they didn't keep the PS2 jaggies, you know for nostalgia reasons.

Yeah PS3 has the edge this time in this area.

From what i've seen so far, in benchmarks. Theoretically PS3 is slightly more powerful, but put into practise its a totally different matter. Besides, its early days, we can't judge anything yet.

What benchmarks? We havent even got final hardware yet? :confused:

Ps3 is clearly more powerful. No argument there. Xbox360 isnt bad either but Sony and Nvidia did a better job this time. Ati need to sort themselves out.

cheets
18-09-2005, 01:25 AM
looks nice, but why the shit getway

The3rdChildren
18-09-2005, 01:33 AM
Scarily realistic, let's hope Sony are telling the truth with these.

GoonFace
18-09-2005, 03:09 PM
They always have always will.

For once, I agree with you Choze.

Domstercool
18-09-2005, 05:34 PM
I want MGS4 now :(

RoadKill
18-09-2005, 05:52 PM
looks nice, but why the shit getway

Haha, yeah, the Getaway screenshot lets it down, it looks like ass.

Choze
18-09-2005, 06:12 PM
Haha, yeah, the Getaway screenshot lets it down, it looks like ass.

Getaway is just a graphic demo yet. Its running only on the cell processor. Doesnt use any GPU at all! Thats why its very impressive. Normally GPU does all these effects or the CPU would not be capable at all.

JonSt
18-09-2005, 06:23 PM
are these all in game shots or are they pre rendered?

Happenstance
18-09-2005, 06:32 PM
The graphics do look nice although obviously not ingame shots. To be honest I only seem to care about graphics before the game comes out, once im actually playing it im far more interested in gameplay and story than anything else

dukkadukka
18-09-2005, 09:02 PM
tell me this, if a game like, gta for instance, had photorealistic graphics, would it make it play better?

if it looked like crap it wouldn't have sold so many copies though, would it? i'm not stating my opinion now, just fact. graphics sell consoles. the only reason sony are focusing on graphics right now is because it's guaranteed to make them money.

dukkadukka
18-09-2005, 10:08 PM
gta technically does have, well, the graphics are average, the features is what sells the game, and the fact that it is done in a 3d environment. gta was popular since the top down view days, where the graphics werent that great, and many people thought it was fun
you can't deny the sales jump the series took once it had its' makeover though. gameplay is still very important, but to the average gamer graphics are still an important factor. look at driv3r and enter the matrix, they both sold very well because of graphics and hype, gameplay was a very minor factor in their success.

dukkadukka
18-09-2005, 10:24 PM
im not saying graphics isnt what sells a game, im saying graphics doesnt make a game better
lol, then it seems we both agreed but we wre having different conversations to eachother :happy:

Stocka
18-09-2005, 10:28 PM
im not saying graphics isnt what sells a game, im saying graphics doesnt make a game better
Graphics can make games better, because say for example, a Zelda game, they can add to the atmosphere to create a more magical,emotional setting compared to say if everywhere the graphics in Twilight Princess looked like say this
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2005/086/reviews/921915_20050328_screen005.jpg

Bren
18-09-2005, 10:31 PM
lol, snakes ciggys seems to be a bit banana'd...

it was bugging me so i had to say it

Eddage
18-09-2005, 11:06 PM
lol, snakes ciggys seems to be a bit banana'd...

it was bugging me so i had to say it

Surely if Snakes been smoking for so long the lung cancer must be kicking in by now!

Maybe thats what this game is all about terrorists have solen the cure to cancer in order to create the most powerful biological weapon known to mankind Snakes goes in to get it back and everyone hails him as the savour of the human race when really he was just loking out for his own arse!

RoadKill
19-09-2005, 01:15 PM
Getaway is just a graphic demo yet. Its running only on the cell processor. Doesnt use any GPU at all! Thats why its very impressive. Normally GPU does all these effects or the CPU would not be capable at all.

It's got jack shit to do with power, it's got to do with developer competency, just because a system is powerful, games can still look ass.

Colin
19-09-2005, 02:06 PM
It's got jack shit to do with power, it's got to do with developer competency, just because a system is powerful, games can still look ass.

Yeah I totally agree with this.

This coming generation you're going to see alot of titles lag behind in visual quality. There'll be such a diversity in budgets and artistic talent where the smaller studios won't be able to match your Capcoms and Konami's of this world.

I just hope that the european games industry isn't going to decline because of this............as we've seen in the past, those without money are going to struggle.

Flame Alchemist
19-09-2005, 05:08 PM
too realistic for me :doh:

it will cost a lot to develop those games...

Librarian
20-09-2005, 11:01 AM
pretty pretty pictures. Like the ancient pictures from Too Human.. and people kept on raving about them, but maybe that was because it originally was GameCube bound.
Im quite content with the power/graphics of the current generation. Im afraid that the new generation will see longer and longer developing time and very expensive games.
(even more expensive than now)